Blog | Subscriptions | Newsletters | Advertising | RSS | Past Issues | About Us | Contact |
 
 
Focus on: Clean Energy
What actions is your company taking to reduce its carbon footprint?

Investing in energy efficiency
Purchasing renewable energy from utility or third party
Investing in onsite renewable energy
Investing in more fuel efficient transportation systems


































 

Courtesy Polycom
Life-size screens suck power, but reduce travel and fuel use.
Telepresence gets real
by Amy Westervelt - 5.6.08

Telepresence suites were heralded as the future of video conferencing when they emerged on the scene in 2006. With large high-definition (HD) plasma screens, top-quality audio and suites dedicated solely to video conferencing, “telepresence” made people feel as though they were face to face, which proponents said would encourage businesses to use technology more often and travel less. The savings from eliminating travel would more than make up for the additional energy and expense required to install and run giant plasma screens and high-definition conference rooms, or so the thinking went.

Though the idea has been slow to catch on, predominantly due to the astronomical cost of the suites—from $200,000 to $350,000, plus $20,000 per month in support fees—analysts are predicting an uptick in sales of telepresence products in 2008 as technology providers including Cisco (Nasdaq: CSCO), Hewlett Packard (NYSE: HPQ), Tandberg, Teliris and Polycom (Nasdaq: PLCM) partner with hotels, service providers and distributors to develop creative partnerships and release smaller, less pricey models.

HP announced a partnership with Marriott Hotels (NYSE: MAR) in March 2008 to provide its Halo telepresence technology at hotels around the world by the end of the year. HP also announced the release of a smaller version of Halo, which is designed for two to four people and will cost roughly $120,000. San Jose–based Cisco announced a deal in 2007 with business-center operator Regus to roll out its telepresence suites at 50 locations worldwide in 2008 and announced in March 2008 a distribution deal with India-based Tata Communications to sell, install and maintain its systems throughout Asia.

Before former Cisco chief development officer Charlie Giancarlo stepped down in December 2007, he announced the release of a consumer high-definition video conferencing system with a $1,000 price tag. But the company has not commented on the system since.

Tandberg has gone an alternate route, partnering with Nortel to provide telepresence services rather than equipment. Tandberg also announced in March 2008 a partnership with Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) to produce a $300
high-definition camera that would “bring high-definition video conferencing to the masses.”

Newcomers to the telepresence game—Quanta Computer, a laptop computer manufacturer, and OoVoo, a video chat software company—have teamed up on a system that allows consumers to connect HDTVs to the Internet for video conferencing.

While telepresence companies tout the technology’s “green” potential, citing reduced business travel and related carbon emission, critics point to energy requirements, bandwidth consumption and overall footprint (telepresence requires a dedicated room and network resources), as well as interoperability issues with existing equipment, as environmental concerns.



Post a Comment
Name:

Email:


Comment:



Like this article? Subscribe to Sustainable Industries magazine.

© Sustainable Media Inc. All rights reserved. Permission is required for reproduction in whole or in part. For high-quality reprints of articles, contact FosteReprints at 866-879-9144 or via email: sales@FosteReprints.com
  London looks to U.S.cleantech firms Read More
  Virgance ignites social entrepreneurs Read More
  Tesla snags federal funds Read More
 



 Submit a Job  
   
   
   
  More Jobs  
 Submit an Event  
     
     
     
  More Events