Jump to Navigation

When students become the masters

Increasing numbers of universities are integrating sustainability into their curriculums, training the next generation of business leaders.

The diverse crises that the planet faces will only be solved when companies and communities implement authentic and innovative sustainability practices. It is therefore encouraging that there are an increasing number of colleges and universities now including sustainability as part of their campus management programs and curriculum.

Are these programs effective enough to create the next generation of thought leaders our world needs? The answer is, “No. Not yet.”

A good start is underway, however. Pressure from companies, students, and ranking organizations is forcing colleges and universities to embrace sustainability.

The business community is demanding candidates with sustainability training. Accenture found that over 93 percent of CEO’s see sustainability as crucial to business success, with 88 percent stating it needs to be fully embedded into their strategy and operations.

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting is increasing annually, creating job openings for graduates familiar with integrated reporting. Given that about 20 percent of CSR reports each year are submitted by companies reporting for the first time, recruiting candidates who are familiar with sustainability, or training existing employees is a top priority for these companies. Job candidates who have a strong knowledge of sustainability are better positioned not only to fill current job openings, but help lead their companies into the future. 

A 2010 study by McKinsey found, however, that many companies need education on how to go forward. Most executives surveyed considered sustainability important to their future, agreeing that the management of environmental, social, and governance issues was “very” or “extremely” important in a wide range of areas, including new product development, reputation building, and overall corporate strategy. However, only 30 percent said that their companies actively sought opportunities to invest in sustainability or embed it in their business practices. Respondents admitted to a pervasive lack of understanding of what sustainability is and how to implement it. This educational gap, they stated, was inhibiting action. 

In part in recognition of this opportunity, and in part because this is what they care about – MonsterTRAK reports that 92 percent of recent college graduates want to work for a company that cares about the environment – students have been a major driver for campus sustainability. At the University of Colorado, Boulder (CU), students demanded that all new buildings be LEED-certified. Now CU has 14 LEED-certified buildings. This is not unique to CU. According to the Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE) in 2011 more green building efforts were underway on campuses than ever before. Additionally, 677 colleges and universities, representing all 50 states and more than 6 million students, one third of the national student body, have signed the American College and University President’s Climate Challenge (ACUPCC). Signatories commit to create a plan to achieve carbon neutrality on campus and to integrate sustainability throughout their curriculum.

As the interest in sustainability and “green collar” jobs has grown, colleges and universities have incorporated sustainability across their operations and into degree programs. Of the roughly 4,000 colleges and universities within the U.S., 65 percent have instituted an Office of Sustainabilityor at least a centralized program management office to oversee the diverse number of sustainability programs on campus.

The National Wildlife Federation found that 64 percent of campus leaders believe that environmental stewardship and sustainability fits with the culture and values of their campus, and 17 percent stated that it helps with student recruitment. Colleges that invest in sustainability are saving money and gaining a competitive advantage.

Students are looking for schools that make living and teaching sustainability a priority in their coursework and in campus life. Two thirds of the more than 15,000 respondents to The Princeton Review’s “College Hopes & Worries Survey,” said that “they would favor having information about a college’s commitment to the environment and that it may impact their decision to apply to or attend the school.” Almost 25 percent said it would “Strongly” or “Very Much” contribute to their assessment of a school.

To help students choose, campuses are reporting their initiatives to external outlets that rank or track their sustainability efforts. The Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education (AASHE), partnered with Princeton Review and Sierra Magazine, provides the Sustainability Tracking, Assessment and Reporting System (STARS). The 2011 Green Report Card issued by the Sustainable Endowments Institute showed dramatic increases in implementation of their 52 green indicators over results from 2007. More than 60 percent of schools surveyed have made a commitment to cut carbon emissions compared to 23 percent in 2006. Seventy percent have a campus farm or garden, up from 9 percent in 2006. Almost 80 percent have implemented a green building policy, compared to 22 percent in 2006, and almost all (95 percent) have a formal sustainability committee. In 2006 only 40 percent did.

Proquest’s list of "Academic Programs in Sustainability" counts 180 total programs in the U.S., 134 degree programs and 46 certificate programs. This is up from zero a few years ago. Universities such as Arizona State even offer a PhD in Sustainability.

Comments

Carl Hammerdorfer's picture

Agree with Hunter's argument here. There are some hopeful signs of universities coming around. At Colorado State University, where I work, we have a School of Global Environmental Sustainability, and a Global Social and Sustainable Enterprise MBA (www.csugsse.org) which has this contact integrated in 100% of the coursework.

Hunter Lovins's picture

Aye, Carl's right. The GSE course at CSU is one of the better programs. Professors like Paul Hudnet (a mentor with me at the Unreasonable Institute, as well) bring real world experience coupled with academic excellence. I've been honored to have worked a bit with this program.

Scott Fullwiler's picture

Excellent article, though unfortunate that Presidio Graduate School isn't included with the likes of BGI and Bard. The three MBA programs are based largely on the same principles of sustainability, systems theory, and transformational leadership. Presidio's been a trail blazer in all the things mentioned in this article for many years.

Anonymous's picture

Me thinks it is very intentional that Presidio is not included. Hunter has an axe to grind....

Hunter Lovins's picture

IMHO Presidio was a trail blazer, but has lost that status. Essentially every professor who knew much about sustainability has left. For the real scoop from the inside check out http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Presidio-Graduate-School-Company-Review.... This pains me, as I was a founding professor at Presidio and resigned in protest over tow years ago. It's gotten worse.

Gifford Pinchot III, President of BGI's picture

Re: Hunter's comments concerning Presidio. Everyone has the right to express their opinions, which includes the academic freedom of any BGI faculty member. However, although Hunter is teaching at BGI now, her opinions are her own and not the position of BGl.

BGI is currently working with Presidio to advance the field of Sustainable Business. We have just had a very good experience with Presidio in jointly putting on the Madrona League Business Plan Competition. There was good cooperation and a gratifying success. We wish Presidio well. We are all working on building a more sustainable world.

Donna Montgomery's picture

As Gifford states above, “We are all working on building a more sustainable world.” It is unsustainable to splinter the sustainability movement, & in fact, several schools are attempting to bridge gaps created by a false sense of competition evident in years past.

However, if I were a potential student or faculty, my first question would be this: Is the school itself walking its’ talk? Can it reasonably state that it is following the concepts being taught to the students? It is this kind of decoupling - between what is said and what is actually done - that leads to unsustainable systems for the humans inside of it. Take a look at the turnover; it might provide some clues.

Degreed's picture

Interesting points. As a graduate with an MBA in Sustainability (from one of the very first and most respected programs, the Presidio Graduate School), I would agree with some of the points, and disagree with others. I can say that the business world cares far more about your previous industry experience than it does where you received 'sustainabilty' training or what was included in the curriculum. If you don't have former relevant experience, or if you don't have experience implementing sustainabilty programs at corporations, they really don't want to hear form you. This leads me to disagree wholeheartedly about there not being enough programs. With over 100 programs, there is more supply than demand for graduates. I know this from personal experience.

As far as 'alternative' programs such as the Unreasonable Institute, while I find these programs interesting, it is hard to imagine a Fortune 1000 company hiring someone based on this type of education.

What is much more likely to be effective are the certificate programs for working professionals. The author is well aware that such a program already exists as an option at Presidio but interestingly does not mention it. As a graduate from the Daniels School of Business (University of Denver) as well as PGS, I am not really that impressed with their certificate program and it certainly doesn't stack up in terms of domain knowledge to dedicated sustainability organizations such as PGS.

BTW, Marlboro is considered one of the 'leaders?" Really?

Hunter Lovins's picture

Yes, really. And a Fellow at the Unreasonable Institute will BE a Fortune 100 company CEO in a few decades. The point of accelerators like Unreasonable is NOT to create fodder for the existing companies but to break the mold and create the next generation of companies that will transform the world. Very few MBA's, especially those from the schools that just teach you to follow the rules, will do much to take on the gnarly challenges now facing the world.

And when you went to Daniels the Sustainability Leadership and Implementation Certificate did not exist. You might try it - it will give you all that you did not get at PIGS

Jason Dow's picture

Great article. It's great to see this happening. But there is some glaring ommissions, for example
Business leaders highly interested in sustainabilty? Sustainabilty of what exactly? Their profits?
The footprint analysis tells us our macro footprint today is 1.4 of the total productivity of planet Earth.
We have 2-3 billion jumping onto the consumption train globally so if my calculator works technology is not capable of offsetting that growth in consumption completely so our overall footprint will grow under this scenario.
The ungodly truth is consumption is going to fall whether it's by choice or collapse. When this begins to be discussed seriously then real progress will be possible...

Hunter Lovins's picture

Jason, you may well be right.

I sure hope not, and if companies do not adopt authentic sustainability, you will be right. What is genuine sustainability? It means setting the sorts of goals that Ray Anderson did at Interface with his Mission Zero - zero impact, zero footprint. They are half way there, with 82% reduction in carbon emissions, increased use of renewables - and doubled profits. Or

Paul Polman's recent leadership at Unilever: the Sustainable LIving Plan calls for cutting the company's impact in half by 2020,sourcing anything from agriculture from sustainable operations and lifting a billion people out of poverty. In service of that, he's stopped reporting quarterly, correctly observing that doing that drives a company to short-term management. It means companies running their operations using approaches like radically sustainable manufacturing (see our UNIDO paper, The Future of Industry in Asia, http://www.natcapsolutions.org/UNIDO/UNIDO_TheFutureofIndustryinAsia_NCS...) and it will mean transforming our economy to a cradle to cradle economy - Walter Stahel's concept (I know, those of you who haven't gone to a good school probably never knew that was where that concept came from - but it is... :-)

Will we get there? Not with traditional MBA programs.

Perhaps tho, if we can replicate the best programs, we just might.

Here's hoping.

Christina Meinberg's picture

As a graduate of a top 20 MBA program (w/ a degree emphasis in sustainable enterprise) and a current employee in another traditional MBA program that has a strong social/environmental impact focus, I can speak to - and am continuously inspired by - the groundswell of interest among students and companies driving towards a more sustainable future. Berkeley-Haas is also proud to be one of 14 institutional members of ARCS - which exists to promote rigorous research in sustainability (visit: www.corporate-sustainability.org/). Onwards!

Hunter Lovins's picture

Berkeley Haas is another of the leading programs. Kelly McElhany's Center for Corporate Responsibility was one of the earliest efforts and remains one of the best. And as Christina says, their membership in ARCS is a valuable service to us all. I'll be honored to be a Regents Lecturer at UC Berkeley Spring 2013, and have the chance to interact more with my friends at Haas.

Kevin Hagen's picture

In the last year I have had the honor of speaking at 4 or 5 of the top rated MBA programs in the country about the work of my company and the role of a Sustainability leader in business. The growth and depth of programs is encouraging. At the same time I find few programs that are delivering a full exposure to the thought leadership, case work and sound academic literature that is now available. A great sign is the growth of Net Impact chapters on campus (now over 300 I'm told). My conclusion is the when it comes to Sustainable Business Education at the traditional highly regarded MBA schools; the students are ahead of the faculty, and the faculty is ahead of the administration. This upside down situation shows in the feedback in reports such as "Business as unusual" and "Beyond Gray Pinstrips". Both excellent resources.

Kevin Hagen
Dir CSR
REI

Hunter Lovins's picture

Thanks Kevin. And thank you for your longstanding leadership in the corporate world.

Nancy Van Leuven's picture

Let’s bring this conversation back to Hunter’s main focus: Pressure is forcing higher ed to embrace sustainability, meaning that more “students can lead their companies into the future.” HOORAY!

And, with more schools embedding systems thinking, sustainability, and leadership within learning models, the ranking lists grow longer and more competitive. It’s inevitable that not all schools will remain at the top of their game or be mentioned in every post, given the crowded playing field.

I think another interesting angle is the blurring between academia and activism. If your MBA school is going to be ranked in “Beyond Gray Pinstripes”, as is the University of Colorado at Boulder, your faculty must be researching and publishing as academic experts, expanding the body of knowledge. If your school is going to be independently accredited, as is Bainbridge Graduate Institute, you must follow the standards of WASC or ACICS, which includes rigorous coursework, school organization and governance, qualified staff, and student achievement.

Hunter, I applaud your dedication to helping students become masters. As a sustainability activist working with American Indian tribes, I recommend we add one more category to the list: Diversity. Take a look at your faculty, your students, your boards of directors, and your inner cultures beyond the male/female ratio. Students who are becoming masters of social justice must also make the business case for diversity so that sustainability doesn’t become an argument among elites.

Hunter Lovins's picture

Well said, Nancy.

Diversity is very important. At BGI it is a major commitment of the entire community. The faculty are delightfully diverse, as is the student body. There is a campus club to promote Diversity and Social Justice. I wear a D&SJ button that the students sell to raise money to promote diversity programs. But what is particularly cool is that every faculty's syllabus is submitted to the D&SJ committee for review to ensure that diversity issues are being addressed in class. When I first got mine back I thought, "wow, we never did that at Presidio. What a great idea!"

I'll be suggesting it at the Bard Faculty retreat coming up.

eecster's picture

Question for everyone - how do newly interested and current students break into this industry?

Recruitment Database's picture

So much involvement of students in sustainable activities in college level is a praiseworthy indication. But the driving force should not be only to fulfill the specific criteria of management level posting in business. Rather such involvements should be integrated from junior school level so that respecting and caring environment would be embedded in to our consciousness from early days.

Leave a comment

Alternately, you may login or register an account
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <i> <strong> <b> <ul> <ol> <li> <br> <blockquote> [pagebreak]
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.